TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27010:2015vsIEEE 1686

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls map to IEEE 1686. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 maps to IEEE 1686 with 25% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 11-13: Physical, Operations, and Communications Security(2 mappings)

27010-12.2Protection from malware
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
27010-13.1Communications Security
→IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring

Communications(1 mappings)

27010-13.1Communications Security
→IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring

Incidents(3 mappings)

27010-15.1Incident Management3 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper

Clause 14-16: System Development, Supplier Relations, and Incident Management(4 mappings)

27010-15.1Incident Management3 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper
27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills

Continuity(1 mappings)

27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills

Membership(1 mappings)

27010-8.2Membership Termination
→IEEE1686-Scope-IED-Substation-Automation-2022-IEC-NERC-NIST-CoordIEEE 1686 - Scope + Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs) + Substation Automation + 2022 Edition + Coordination with IEC 62351 + IEC 62443 + NERC CIP + NIST SP 800-82

Clause 7-8: Human Resources and Asset Management(1 mappings)

27010-8.2Membership Termination
→IEEE1686-Scope-IED-Substation-Automation-2022-IEC-NERC-NIST-CoordIEEE 1686 - Scope + Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs) + Substation Automation + 2022 Edition + Coordination with IEC 62351 + IEC 62443 + NERC CIP + NIST SP 800-82

Access Control(2 mappings)

27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel

Clause 9-10: Access Control and Cryptography(2 mappings)

27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel
27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 27001:202210 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts8 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management8 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 58 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.08 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments7 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security7 mappings

Other IEEE 1686 comparisons

IEC 62443 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs IEEE 16865 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IEEE 16865 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs IEEE 16865 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs IEEE 16865 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs IEEE 16865 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and IEEE 1686?

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 has 28 controls across its framework, while IEEE 1686 covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance, where 6 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct IEEE 1686 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and IEEE 1686?

Of 28 total ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls, 13 map directly to IEEE 1686 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27010:2015 to IEEE 1686?

33 ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in IEEE 1686. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27010:2015 and IEEE 1686?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 17-18 and Annexes: Continuity and Compliance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.