TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)vsIEEE 1686

See exactly how OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls map to IEEE 1686. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) maps to IEEE 1686 with 67% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Metrics and Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Culture and Organization(1 mappings)

DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills

Build and Deployment(4 mappings)

DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management4 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.1-AccessControl-Accounts-Roles-Password-Session-RemoteIEEE 1686 Section 5.1 - Electronic Access Account Management + Roles + Password + Failed Login + Session + Remote Access + Personnel
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper

Test and Verification(3 mappings)

DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing3 targets
→IEEE1686-IR-Recovery-Reporting-Exercises-Drills-RECOVIEEE 1686 - Incident Response + Recovery from Failed Update + Reporting to Authorities + Coordination with Sector-Specific Agencies + Exercises and Drills
→IEEE1686-Section5.5-5.6-5.7-5.8-Firmware-ConfigSW-TimeSync-DataAtRestIEEE 1686 Section 5.5-5.8 - Firmware Quality + Configuration Software Security + Time Synchronisation + Data Protection at Rest + Patch + Malware + Hardening + Vulnerability
→IEEE1686-SupplyChain-Documentation-Procurement-ComplianceTable-PhysicalIEEE 1686 Section 6 IED Security Documentation + Supply Chain + Procurement Specification + Appendix A Compliance Table + Physical and Tamper

Information Gathering and Monitoring(1 mappings)

DSOMM-5Information Gathering, Logging, Monitoring, and Incident Response
→IEEE1686-Section5.2-5.3-AuditLog-Retention-Export-MonitoringIEEE 1686 Section 5.2 + 5.3 - Audit Trail Records + Retention + Export + Supervisory Monitoring and Control + Network Security Monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1466 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1456 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Liechtenstein DPA5 mappings

Other IEEE 1686 comparisons

IEC 62443 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs IEEE 16866 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IEEE 16865 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs IEEE 16865 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs IEEE 16865 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs IEEE 16865 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and IEEE 1686?

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) has 6 controls across its framework, while IEEE 1686 covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Metrics and Improvement, where 1 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct IEEE 1686 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and IEEE 1686?

Of 6 total OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls, 4 map directly to IEEE 1686 controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to IEEE 1686?

2 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct equivalent in IEEE 1686. The highest concentration of gaps is in Metrics and Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and IEEE 1686?

The domain with the highest gap count is Metrics and Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.