Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000vsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how ISO 31000 controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000 maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 ISO 31000 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ISO 31000: Risk Framework & Governance(6 mappings)

ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
ISO31000-05Risk management integration3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

ISO 31000: Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

ISO 31000: Risk Monitoring & Review(4 mappings)

ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
ISO31000-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 31000 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

ISO 31000 has 20 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment, where 5 ISO 31000 controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 20 total ISO 31000 controls, 7 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000 to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

13 ISO 31000 controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 31000: Risk Treatment (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.