Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how ISO 31000 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 ISO 31000 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ISO 31000: Risk Framework & Governance(4 mappings)

ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope2 targets
3.16System and Services Acquisition
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO31000-05Risk management integration2 targets
3.16System and Services Acquisition
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

ISO 31000: Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
3.11Risk Assessment
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
3.11Risk Assessment
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis
3.11Risk Assessment

ISO 31000: Risk Monitoring & Review(3 mappings)

ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance2 targets
3.16System and Services Acquisition
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO31000-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 31000 comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 31000 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

ISO 31000 has 20 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment, where 5 ISO 31000 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 20 total ISO 31000 controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

13 ISO 31000 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 31000: Risk Treatment with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 31000: Risk Treatment (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.