Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000vsNIST SP 800-37

See exactly how ISO 31000 controls map to NIST SP 800-37. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000 maps to NIST SP 800-37 with 16% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 ISO 31000 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISO 31000: Risk Framework & Governance(4 mappings)

ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope2 targets
NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation
NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation
ISO31000-05Risk management integration2 targets
NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation
NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation

ISO 31000: Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation2 targets
NISTSP37-2RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation
NISTSP37-3RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development2 targets
NISTSP37-2RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation
NISTSP37-3RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis2 targets
NISTSP37-2RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation
NISTSP37-3RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection

ISO 31000: Risk Monitoring & Review(3 mappings)

ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance2 targets
NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation
NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation
ISO31000-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 31000 and NIST SP 800-37?

ISO 31000 has 43 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-37 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Principles, where 9 ISO 31000 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-37 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000 and NIST SP 800-37?

Of 43 total ISO 31000 controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-37 controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000 to NIST SP 800-37?

36 ISO 31000 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-37. The highest concentration of gaps is in Principles with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000 and NIST SP 800-37?

The domain with the highest gap count is Principles (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.