TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27005vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how ISO 27005 controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27005 maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 30% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 ISO 27005 controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 820K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 820K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ISO 27005: Risk Framework & Governance(6 mappings)

ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
ISO27005-05Risk management integration3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

ISO 27005: Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

ISO27005-06Risk identification methods2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified

ISO 27005: Risk Monitoring & Review(3 mappings)

ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27005 comparisons

ISO 27005 vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System7 mappingsISO 27005 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20177 mappingsISO 27005 vs COSO ERM7 mappingsISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsISO 27005 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence7 mappingsISO 27005 vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience7 mappingsISO 27005 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsISO 27005 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation7 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.021 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) Cyber Risk Management Code of Conduct vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (820K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27005 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

ISO 27005 has 20 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 103 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment, where 5 ISO 27005 controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27005 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 20 total ISO 27005 controls, 6 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

14 ISO 27005 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 27005: Risk Treatment (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.