TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable ProcurementvsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)

See exactly how ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 16% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 4: Understanding the Fundamentals of Sustainable Procurement(6 mappings)

ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement3 targets
→ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)
→ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)
→ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)
ISO-20400-4.3Core subjects of sustainable procurement3 targets
→ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)
→ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)
→ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)

Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability(1 mappings)

ISO-20400-6.5Monitoring and continuous improvement
→ILO-FP-5.2Promotional Framework for OSH Convention (C187)

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)7 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs TNFD Recommendations7 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs South Korea ISMS-P7 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs AASB S2 Climate-related Disclosures7 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence7 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence7 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System7 mappings

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

ASEAN Data Management Framework vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsEU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement has 19 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process, where 5 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Of 19 total ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls, 3 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

16 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.