Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable ProcurementvsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)

See exactly how ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls map to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
37%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement maps to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) with 37% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 4: Understanding the Fundamentals of Sustainable Procurement(7 mappings)

ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement3 targets
IM8-GOV.2Roles and Responsibilities
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
TNFD-GOV-CHuman Rights and Stakeholder Engagement
ISO-20400-4.3Core subjects of sustainable procurement
TNFD-GOV-CHuman Rights and Stakeholder Engagement
ISO-20400-4.5Key considerations for sustainable procurement3 targets
AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
IM8-GOV.4ICT Security Risk Management
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management

Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process(5 mappings)

ISO-20400-7.2Integrating sustainability into specifications2 targets
IM8-GOV.2Roles and Responsibilities
IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning
IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Other Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement has 19 controls across its framework, while Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability, where 5 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

Of 19 total ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls, 7 map directly to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement to Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

12 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct equivalent in Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.