TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)

See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
42
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 6% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security Program.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Definitions and Scope(6 mappings)

MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery3 targets
→ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)
→ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)
→ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)
MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities3 targets
→ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)
→ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)
→ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)

Enforcement and Administration(1 mappings)

NAIC-668-8Confidentiality
→ILO-FP-1.1Freedom of Association (C87)

Related Comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)19 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs FedRAMP Rev 519 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange19 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs South Korea ISMS-P18 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation18 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappings

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

ASEAN Data Management Framework vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsEU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 49 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security Program, where 16 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.

How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Of 49 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 3 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

46 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security Program with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security Program (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.