ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable ProcurementvsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
See exactly how ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls map to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement maps to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 37% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 4: Understanding the Fundamentals of Sustainable Procurement(3 mappings)
Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability(1 mappings)
Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process(7 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement has 19 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability, where 4 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
Of 19 total ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls, 7 map directly to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
12 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.