Cross-Framework Mapping

Indiana Consumer Data Protection ActvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Indiana CDPA Controller Obligations(1 mappings)

INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary
CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption

Indiana CDPA Security + Breach + Records(4 mappings)

INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification4 targets
CPG-3.ALog Collection
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Related Comparisons

Other Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act has 8 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional, where 1 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 8 total Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls, 2 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

6 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.