TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)vsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)

See exactly how ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls map to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) maps to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) with 40% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Safe and Healthy Working Environment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Freedom of Association(1 mappings)

ILO-FP-1.1Freedom of Association (C87)
→NAIC-668-8Confidentiality

Elimination of Forced Labour(2 mappings)

ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)2 targets
→MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery
→MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities

Abolition of Child Labour(4 mappings)

ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)2 targets
→MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery
→MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities
ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)2 targets
→MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery
→MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities

Related Comparisons

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ASEAN Data Management Framework4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs EU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update)3 mappings

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)19 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)19 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)19 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)18 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) has 10 controls across its framework, while NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Safe and Healthy Working Environment, where 2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) equivalent.

How many controls map between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

Of 10 total ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls, 4 map directly to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) to NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

6 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct equivalent in NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668). The highest concentration of gaps is in Safe and Healthy Working Environment with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Safe and Healthy Working Environment (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.