ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)vsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)
See exactly how ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls map to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) maps to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in ILO FPRW Supply Chain + Reporting + Coord.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.
ILO FPRW Category 2 - Forced Labour(3 mappings)
ILO FPRW Category 3 - Child Labour(3 mappings)
ILO FPRW Category 5 - OSH(1 mappings)
A ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls your existing ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 38% in the header counts how many ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons
Other German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 692 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) has 8 controls across its framework, while German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ILO FPRW Supply Chain + Reporting + Coord, where 1 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) equivalent.
How many controls map between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
Of 8 total ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls, 3 map directly to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls, representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
5 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct equivalent in German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The highest concentration of gaps is in ILO FPRW Supply Chain + Reporting + Coord with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
The domain with the highest gap count is ILO FPRW Supply Chain + Reporting + Coord (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.