ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)vsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)
See exactly how ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls map to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) maps to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) with 40% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Elimination of Discrimination.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Elimination of Forced Labour(3 mappings)
Abolition of Child Labour(6 mappings)
Safe and Healthy Working Environment(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons
Other German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) has 10 controls across its framework, while German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Elimination of Discrimination, where 2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) equivalent.
How many controls map between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
Of 10 total ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls, 4 map directly to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) to German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
6 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct equivalent in German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG). The highest concentration of gaps is in Elimination of Discrimination with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Elimination of Discrimination (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.