TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)vsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement

See exactly how ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls map to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) maps to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement with 40% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Elimination of Discrimination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Elimination of Forced Labour(2 mappings)

ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)2 targets
→ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement
→ISO-20400-4.3Core subjects of sustainable procurement

Abolition of Child Labour(4 mappings)

ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)2 targets
→ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement
→ISO-20400-4.3Core subjects of sustainable procurement
ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)2 targets
→ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement
→ISO-20400-4.3Core subjects of sustainable procurement

Safe and Healthy Working Environment(1 mappings)

ILO-FP-5.2Promotional Framework for OSH Convention (C187)
→ISO-20400-6.5Monitoring and continuous improvement

Related Comparisons

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ASEAN Data Management Framework4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs EU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update)3 mappings

Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappingsTNFD Recommendations vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappingsAASB S2 Climate-related Disclosures vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappingsISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) has 10 controls across its framework, while ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Elimination of Discrimination, where 2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement equivalent.

How many controls map between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

Of 10 total ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls, 4 map directly to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

6 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement. The highest concentration of gaps is in Elimination of Discrimination with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

The domain with the highest gap count is Elimination of Discrimination (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.