TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsUS NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants with 42% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 3: Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Domain 1: Governance(6 mappings)

CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management

Domain 3: Protection(2 mappings)

CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
CRAF-3.5Security Awareness Training
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training

Domain 4: Detection(2 mappings)

CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence
→73.54(f)Plan Review and Update
CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection
→RG5.71-C.7Continuous Monitoring

Domain 5: Response and Recovery(3 mappings)

CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
→RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
→RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration

Domain 6: Situational Awareness(1 mappings)

CRAF-6.1Cyber Threat Landscape Monitoring
→73.54(f)Plan Review and Update

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.014 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs RBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)13 mappings

Other US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 3: Protection, where 4 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 10 map directly to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

14 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 3: Protection with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 3: Protection (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.