TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial InstitutionsvsUS NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants

See exactly how Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls map to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions maps to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants with 32% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(8 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→73.54(f)Plan Review and Update
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
→RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan

Security Operations(4 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-01Security Monitoring and Detection2 targets
→73.54(f)Plan Review and Update
→RG5.71-C.7Continuous Monitoring
JP-FSA-CYB-OPS-02Incident Response and Recovery2 targets
→RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration

Related Comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202413 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)12 mappings

Other US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions has 19 controls across its framework, while US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 12 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants equivalent.

How many controls map between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

Of 19 total Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls, 6 map directly to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

13 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct equivalent in US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.