ISO/IEC 27400:2022vsUS NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls map to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 maps to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants with 3% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Governance(1 mappings)
Clause 5: IoT Risk Sources(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Other US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?
ISO/IEC 27400:2022 has 32 controls across its framework, while US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants covers 5 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework, where 7 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?
Of 32 total ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls, 2 map directly to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27400:2022 to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?
40 ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27400:2022 and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.