TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsUS NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants with 40% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Threat and Vulnerability Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→73.54(f)Plan Review and Update

Data Security and Privacy(1 mappings)

CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration

Infrastructure and Operations Security(9 mappings)

CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
→RG5.71-C.7Continuous Monitoring
CSA-INF-04Incident Management4 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery3 targets
→RG5.71-C.3Cyber Security Training
→RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
→RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)14 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs BIMCO Cyber Security12 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CAIQ (CSA)12 mappings

Other US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Threat and Vulnerability Management, where 5 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 6 map directly to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

9 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants. The highest concentration of gaps is in Threat and Vulnerability Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and US NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Cyber Security for Nuclear Power Plants?

The domain with the highest gap count is Threat and Vulnerability Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.