TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
38
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 22% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(1 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration(2 mappings)

CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture
CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
CAT-D3-2Detective controls
→ORANWG11-7Logging, Monitoring, Incident Response, and Denial-of-Service Resilience
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Domain 4: External Dependency Management(1 mappings)

CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(1 mappings)

CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(2 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics
→ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
CAT-IRP-5External threats
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Maturity Levels(1 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving
→ORANWG11-1O-RAN Threat Model, Risk Management, and Security Architecture

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.010 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs Ghana Cybersecurity Act9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs FISMA9 mappings

Other O-RAN WG11 Security Specification comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 11 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

38 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.