TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security with 20% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(2 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
CAT-D1-4Training and culture
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(5 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls2 targets
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access
→NISTSP82-5OT Configuration Management, Patching, Vulnerability Management, and Malware Protection
CAT-D3-2Detective controls
→NISTSP82-6OT Audit, Monitoring, Anomaly Detection, and OT-Specific SOC
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls2 targets
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
→NISTSP82-5OT Configuration Management, Patching, Vulnerability Management, and Malware Protection

Domain 4: External Dependency Management(1 mappings)

CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(3 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
→NISTSP82-7OT Incident Response, Forensics, Recovery, and Continuity
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing2 targets
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration
→NISTSP82-5OT Configuration Management, Patching, Vulnerability Management, and Malware Protection

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(1 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics
→NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access

Maturity Levels(1 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving
→NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.010 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs Ghana Cybersecurity Act9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs FISMA9 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 10 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

39 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.