TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 18% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(3 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
CAT-D1-4Training and culture
→3.2.1Account data storage minimised

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(5 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
CAT-D3-2Detective controls2 targets
→3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
→3.3.1Audit Record Creation
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration

Domain 4: External Dependency Management(1 mappings)

CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(2 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(1 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics
→3.7.1Key generation procedures

Maturity Levels(2 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.010 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs Ghana Cybersecurity Act9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs FISMA9 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 9 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

40 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.