TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 20% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(3 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration(4 mappings)

CAT-D2-1Threat intelligence2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums
CAT-D2-2Monitoring and analyzing2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

CAT-D3-2Detective controls
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(6 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy3 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(3 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
CAT-IRP-5External threats2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums

Maturity Levels(2 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 726 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs RBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs ISO 27001:202211 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 726 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 10 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

39 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.