Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsITIL 4

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to ITIL 4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
44
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to ITIL 4 with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 445K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 445K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
ITIL4-15Access management for services
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
ITIL4-10Configuration management

Domain 4: External Dependency Management(1 mappings)

CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
ITIL4-15Access management for services

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(2 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
ITIL4-11Incident management
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
ITIL4-03Capacity and availability management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 725 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (445K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ITIL 4?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while ITIL 4 covers 53 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct ITIL 4 equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ITIL 4?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 5 map directly to ITIL 4 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to ITIL 4?

44 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in ITIL 4. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ITIL 4?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.