Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
48
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(1 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics
ISO-15189-6.2Personnel

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 90 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 1 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

48 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.