Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and CompetencevsISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories

See exactly how ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
40
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 19% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls identifies 52 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 5: Structural and Governance Requirements(8 mappings)

ISO-15189-5.1Legal entity3 targets
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system
ISO-15189-5.4Structure and authority3 targets
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system
ISO-15189-5.6Risk management2 targets
ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records

Clause 6: Resource Requirements(8 mappings)

ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions2 targets
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability2 targets
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements2 targets
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability2 targets
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability

Clause 7: Process Requirements(1 mappings)

ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records

Clause 8: Management System Requirements(3 mappings)

ISO-15189-8.1General requirements2 targets
ISO-17025-8.1Options
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records
ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence has 64 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 65 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 18 ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

Of 64 total ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls, 12 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 52 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

52 ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.