FedRAMP ModeratevsISO 22301:2019
See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 22301:2019 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Moderate maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 15% coverage across 47 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 276 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 88 mapped controls across 11 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AT - Awareness and Training(4 mappings)
AU - Audit and Accountability(1 mappings)
CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(12 mappings)
CP - Contingency Planning(3 mappings)
+68 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The FedRAMP Moderate to ISO 22301:2019 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 22301:2019 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 22301:2019 lands at 28.1%, while ISO 22301:2019 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 6.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for ISO 22301:2019, the other asks the reverse.
16 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 41 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
A plan of action and milestones tracking remediation of assessment findings is corrective action under 10.1.
Grounded in CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Continually improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the BCMS using qualitative and quantitative measures, considering the results of analysis and evaluation and the outputs of management review to determine whether there are...
Every one of the 16 evidenced controls and 41 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
21 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 22301:2019. 302 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Awareness of the policy, contribution and implications of nonconformity is required.
Grounded in iso-22301-2019::7.3 Awareness. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.
Every one of the 21 evidenced controls and 302 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 15% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 22301:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 22301:2019?
FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 47 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 43 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 22301:2019?
Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 47 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls, representing 15% coverage. The remaining 276 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to ISO 22301:2019?
276 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 43 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 22301:2019?
The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (43 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.