NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1vsISO 22301:2019
See exactly how NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 22301:2019 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 19% coverage across 37 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 191 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls identifies 154 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in C-SCRM Family: Program Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 191 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 73 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
C-SCRM Family: Awareness and Training(2 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(7 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Configuration Management(1 mappings)
C-SCRM Family: Contingency Planning(10 mappings)
+53 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to ISO 22301:2019 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 22301:2019 controls your existing NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
21 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 36 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Organizational process carrying weaknesses through to closure.
Grounded in 161R1-PM-4 Plan of Action and Milestones Process. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Continually improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the BCMS using qualitative and quantitative measures, considering the results of analysis and evaluation and the outputs of management review to determine whether there are...
Every one of the 21 evidenced controls and 36 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 19% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 22301:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and ISO 22301:2019?
NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 has 191 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 37 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C-SCRM Family: Program Management, where 21 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and ISO 22301:2019?
Of 191 total NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls, 37 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls, representing 19% coverage. The remaining 154 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 to ISO 22301:2019?
154 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in C-SCRM Family: Program Management with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 and ISO 22301:2019?
The domain with the highest gap count is C-SCRM Family: Program Management (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.