Cross-Framework Mapping

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsISO 22301:2019

See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

86
Controls Mapped
111
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 18% coverage across 36 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 161 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 86 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A&A - Audit & Assurance(9 mappings)

CCM-A&A-01Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures
iso-22301-2019::9.2.2Audit programme(s)
CCM-A&A-02Independent Assessments
iso-22301-2019::9.2.1General
CCM-A&A-03Risk Based Planning Assessment
iso-22301-2019::9.2.2Audit programme(s)
CCM-A&A-04Requirements Compliance
iso-22301-2019::4.2.2Legal and regulatory requirements
CCM-A&A-05Audit Management Process3 targets
iso-22301-2019::9.2Internal audit
iso-22301-2019::9.2.1General
iso-22301-2019::9.2.2Audit programme(s)
CCM-A&A-06Remediation2 targets
iso-22301-2019::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-22301-2019::10.2Continual improvement

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(11 mappings)

CCM-BCR-01Business Continuity Management Policy and Procedures5 targets
iso-22301-2019::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-22301-2019::4.4Business continuity management system
iso-22301-2019::5.2Policy
iso-22301-2019::5.2.1Establishing the business continuity policy
iso-22301-2019::5.2.2Communicating the business continuity policy
CCM-BCR-02Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis6 targets
iso-22301-2019::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-22301-2019::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-22301-2019::6.1.2Addressing risks and opportunities
iso-22301-2019::6.2.1Establishing business continuity objectives
iso-22301-2019::8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment
iso-22301-2019::8.2.1General

+66 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to ISO 22301:2019 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 22301:2019 controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into ISO 22301:2019
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 22301:2019 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
9.6%

19 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 22301:2019. 178 are genuine gaps.

81.8%BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience
83.3%A&A - Audit & Assurance
25%GRC - Governance, Risk & Compliance
15.4%HRS - Human Resources Security
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 43 candidate mappings were examined and 2 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Establishing and maintaining an audit programme is the audit policy and procedure.

Grounded in iso-22301-2019::9.2.2 Audit programme(s). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-02 Independent Assessments

Commission audit and assurance assessments from assessors independent of the activity being examined, run them against recognised standards, and repeat them at least annually.

Every one of the 19 evidenced controls and 178 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ISO 22301:2019 to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 18% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 22301:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and ISO 22301:2019?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 36 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 21 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and ISO 22301:2019?

Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 36 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls, representing 18% coverage. The remaining 161 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to ISO 22301:2019?

161 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and ISO 22301:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.