Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsISO 22301:2019

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

62
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
63%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 22301:2019 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 63% coverage across 27 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 16 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 62 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(20 mappings)

CPS230-11Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk4 targets
iso-22301-2019::6.1.1Determining risks and opportunities
iso-22301-2019::8.2Business impact analysis and risk assessment
iso-22301-2019::8.2.1General
iso-22301-2019::8.2.3Risk assessment
CPS230-13Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management2 targets
iso-22301-2019::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-22301-2019::5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities
CPS230-14Board Setting of Senior Manager Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
iso-22301-2019::5.2.2Communicating the business continuity policy
iso-22301-2019::5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities
iso-22301-2019::8.4.2Response structure
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan3 targets
iso-22301-2019::9.2Internal audit
iso-22301-2019::9.2.1General
iso-22301-2019::9.2.2Audit programme(s)
CPS230-8Board Oversight, Approval of the BCP, Tolerance Levels and Service Provider Policy4 targets
iso-22301-2019::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-22301-2019::5.2.1Establishing the business continuity policy
iso-22301-2019::9.3Management review
iso-22301-2019::9.3.1General
CPS230-9Management of the Full Range of Operational Risks
iso-22301-2019::4.2.2Legal and regulatory requirements
CPS230-P12Key Principles for Operational Risk, Resilience and Service Providers
iso-22301-2019::4.4Business continuity management system
CPS230-P18Integration with the Risk Management Framework and Recovery Planning
iso-22301-2019::4.4Business continuity management system
CPS230-P26Assessment of Business and Strategic Decisions on the Risk Profile
iso-22301-2019::4.1Understanding the organization and its context

+42 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to ISO 22301:2019 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 22301:2019 controls your existing APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management into ISO 22301:2019
49.1%

28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. 29 are genuine gaps.

73.7%Operation, ISO 22301:2019
75%Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019
37.5%Context of the organization, ISO 22301:2019
100%Improvement, ISO 22301:2019
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 61 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action

Material weaknesses, control gaps and failures must be remediated, addressing root causes promptly.

Grounded in CPS230-P31 Remediation of Material Operational Risk Weaknesses. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context

Identify the external and internal issues bearing on the organization's purpose that could stop its business continuity management system from delivering the outcomes it is meant to deliver, taking account of its objectives, its products...

Every one of the 28 evidenced controls and 29 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ISO 22301:2019 into APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to ISO 22301:2019
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 63% in the header counts how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 22301:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and ISO 22301:2019?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 27 overlapping controls (63% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 10 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and ISO 22301:2019?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 27 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls, representing 63% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to ISO 22301:2019?

16 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and ISO 22301:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.