TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in AviationvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Part-IS.AR: Authority Requirements(1 mappings)

IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645)(1 mappings)

IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203)(1 mappings)

IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Related Comparisons

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs ISO 27701:201911 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIS2 Directive8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NERC CIP8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs MTCS (Singapore)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs API 11648 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203), where 6 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 34 total EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls, 3 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

33 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.