TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance, Training, Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Open Management and Accountability(1 mappings)

AUPRV-1APP 1 Open and Transparent Management + Privacy Management Framework
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Quality and Security(2 mappings)

AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

High-Risk Processing(5 mappings)

AUPRV-6Sensitive Information, PIA, Privacy by Design, Children5 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Breach Response(2 mappings)

AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Related Comparisons

Other Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs India DPDP Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20207 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance, Training, Enforcement, where 1 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 4 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

4 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance, Training, Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Governance, Training, Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.