TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Enforcement + Sanctions + Articles 66-76 + Habeas Data.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Articles 46-58(5 mappings)

LOPDP-EC-Governance-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Training-Articles-46-58-Compliance-MonitoringEcuador LOPDP Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Privacy by Design + Training5 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Security + Processor + Breach + Articles 37-45(3 mappings)

LOPDP-EC-Security-Processor-Breach-Notification-Articles-37-45-Encryption-72-Hour-SPDP-Notification-CSIRTEcuador LOPDP Security + Processor + Breach Notification + Articles 37-45 + 72-Hour3 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
Coverage crosswalk

A Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls your existing Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) into FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) into Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 25% in the header counts how many Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20205 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Bahrain PDPL5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs Indonesia PDP Law5 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsUAE Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) Regulations vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement + Sanctions + Articles 66-76 + Habeas Data, where 1 Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) controls, 2 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

6 Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement + Sanctions + Articles 66-76 + Habeas Data with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement + Sanctions + Articles 66-76 + Habeas Data (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.