TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 341K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 341K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

HKMA C-RAF Domain 1-2: Governance + Identification (Cyber Strategy, Risk Mgmt, Asset Mgmt, Threat Assessment)(5 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment5 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

HKMA C-RAF Domain 3-4: Protection + Detection (Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing)(3 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel3 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

HKMA C-RAF Domain 5-6: Response & Recovery + Situational Awareness (IR, Recovery, Threat Intel, Info Sharing)(2 mappings)

HKMA-CRAF-Domain5-6-Response-Recovery-SitAwarenessHKMA C-RAF Domain 5 (Response and Recovery) + Domain 6 (Situational Awareness) - Incident Response, Recovery, Threat Landscape, Information Sharing2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs Ghana Cybersecurity Act3 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems3 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs GLBA3 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20243 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FISMA3 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ISO/IEC 30111:20193 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)3 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs Bahrain PDPL3 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (341K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 11 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline, where 4 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 11 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 3 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

8 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA C-RAF: Coordination with HKMA SPM TM-G-1, Sectoral Coordination, 2024-2025 Pipeline (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.