TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal DatavsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Lawful Basis + Consent + Notice + Article 4-12(1 mappings)

DOM172-Lawful-Basis-Consent-Notice-Information-Duty-Articles-4-12-Quality-Principle-Purpose-Limitation-MinimisationDominican Republic Law 172-13 Lawful Basis + Consent + Notice + Information Duty + Articles 4-12
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Security + Article 25 + Breach Notification + Article 22(2 mappings)

DOM172-Security-Measures-Article-25-Encryption-Pseudonymization-Access-Control-Incident-Handling-Breach-Notification-Article-22Dominican Republic Law 172-13 Security Measures + Article 25 + Encryption + Breach Notification2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))

Supervisory + Sanctions + Governance + Modernisation 2024(5 mappings)

DOM172-Supervisory-Authority-Cooperation-Sanctions-Penalties-Articles-77-79-Awareness-Training-Retention-DPO-DesignationDominican Republic Law 172-13 Supervisory Authority + Sanctions + Articles 77-79 + DPO + Awareness5 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
→FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Related Comparisons

Other Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Bahrain PDPL5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20205 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Switzerland FADP5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 20235 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act5 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos, where 1 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls, 3 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

5 Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Database Registration + SIC + Superintendencia de Bancos (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.