Cross-Framework Mapping

Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 45% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CIRMP: Governance and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

CIRMP: Supply Chain Hazards(2 mappings)

CIRMP-s10Supply chain hazard management2 targets
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-02Cybersecurity roles and responsibilities for suppliers are established

CIRMP: Application and Material Risk(2 mappings)

CIRMP-s6Identification of material risks
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
CIRMP-s7General requirement - minimise, eliminate and mitigate all hazards
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded

CIRMP: Cyber and Information Security Hazards(2 mappings)

CIRMP-s8Cyber and information security hazard management
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
CIRMP-s8-FWAdoption of a recognised cyber security framework
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIRMP: Governance and Reporting, where 3 Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 11 total Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls, 5 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

6 Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIRMP: Governance and Reporting with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is CIRMP: Governance and Reporting (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.