TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

42
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
93%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 93% coverage across 27 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protective Measures and Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 726 frameworks | 455K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 42 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 455K+ mappings across 726 frameworks.

Asset Management(3 mappings)

ASIC-CR-AM-1Centralised asset management system2 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-01Inventories of hardware managed by the organization are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-02Inventories of software, services, and systems managed by the organization are maintained
ASIC-CR-AM-2Configuration management
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied

Cyber Awareness and Training(3 mappings)

ASIC-CR-AT-1Staff awareness and training
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided awareness and training to perform cybersecurity duties
ASIC-CR-AT-2Continuous development
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-02Individuals in specialized roles are provided awareness and training
ASIC-CR-AT-3Random staff testing
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided awareness and training to perform cybersecurity duties

Collaboration and Information Sharing(4 mappings)

ASIC-CR-CO-1Confidential information sharing2 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums
→NIST-CSF-RS.CO-03Information is shared with designated internal and external stakeholders
ASIC-CR-CO-2Specialist threat-intelligence providers2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums

Detection Systems and Processes(5 mappings)

ASIC-CR-DE-1Continuous monitoring with SIEM2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03Information is correlated from multiple sources
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
ASIC-CR-DE-2Data analytics for threat integration2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03Information is correlated from multiple sources
ASIC-CR-DE-3Red teaming
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded

Cyber Security Strategy and Governance(5 mappings)

ASIC-CR-GOV-1Board engagement and periodic review of cyber strategy2 targets
→GV.OV-01Risk management strategy outcomes are reviewed
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01Organizational leadership is responsible for cybersecurity risk management
ASIC-CR-GOV-2Treat cyber resilience as a management and investment tool
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon
ASIC-CR-GOV-3Board cyber fluency2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles and responsibilities for cybersecurity risk management are established
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-04Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices

+22 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 726 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs APRA CPS 23411 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 58 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents7 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ACSC Essential Eight1 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 726 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 726 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (455K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 29 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 27 overlapping controls (93% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protective Measures and Controls, where 2 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 29 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 27 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 93% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

2 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protective Measures and Controls with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protective Measures and Controls (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.