Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) SecurityvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Name: NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

75%

Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls identifies 2 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

OT Security Program Governance(9 mappings)

NISTSP82-1OT Security Program Governance, Policy, Roles, and Safety-Security Integration9 targets

→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria

→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes

→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated

→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected

→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations

→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied

OT Risk Assessment(7 mappings)

NISTSP82-2OT Risk Assessment and Threat/Vulnerability Identification7 targets

→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational cybersecurity risk discussions

→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders

→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained

→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use

→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions

OT Access Control and IAM(4 mappings)

NISTSP82-4OT Access Control, Identity, Authentication, and Remote Access4 targets

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced commensurate with risk

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls your existing NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security

Not published yet

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (built to order)

$299

per framework pair, one time

Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
Every gap, with what it requires
Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 75% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 686 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$149/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical, where 1 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls, 6 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

2 NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Supply Chain, Lifecycle, Physical (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.