Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Name: Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

59%

Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 59% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Australian Privacy Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

Asset, Change and Configuration Management(3 mappings)

AESCSF-ACM-1Asset inventory2 targets

→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-01Inventories of hardware managed by the organization are maintained

→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-02Inventories of software, services, and systems managed by the organization are maintained

AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration management

→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied

Cyber Security Program Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-CPM-1Cyber security program management

→NIST-CSF-GV.OC-01Organizational context for cybersecurity risk management is understood

AESCSF-CPM-2Cyber security governance and strategy

→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon

Supply Chain and External Dependencies Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-EDM-1Supply chain risk management2 targets

→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-04Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality

Identity and Access Management(3 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-1Identity management

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed

AESCSF-IAM-2Access control

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

AESCSF-IAM-3Multi-factor authentication

→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-03Users, services, and hardware are authenticated

Event and Incident Response, Continuity of Operations(3 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident response plan

→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties

AESCSF-IR-3Continuity of operations and recovery

→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed

AESCSF-IR-4Incident reporting

→NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents

Information Sharing and Communications(2 mappings)

AESCSF-ISC-1Cyber security information sharing2 targets

→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-02Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums

→NIST-CSF-RS.CO-03Information is shared with designated internal and external stakeholders

Risk Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-RM-1Establish cyber security risk management strategy

→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon

AESCSF-RM-2Identify and assess cyber risks

→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded

Situational Awareness(2 mappings)

AESCSF-SA-1Logging and monitoring

→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events

AESCSF-SA-2Anomaly and event detection

→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities

Threat and Vulnerability Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability management

→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 719 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 59 mappings Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)2 mappings Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs ACSC Essential Eight2 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 719 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$49/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 32 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (59% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Australian Privacy Management, where 2 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 32 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 19 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 59% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

13 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Australian Privacy Management with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Australian Privacy Management (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.