TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASEAN Data Management FrameworkvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how ASEAN Data Management Framework controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

42
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
96%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASEAN Data Management Framework maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 96% coverage across 26 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 724 frameworks | 440K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 42 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 440K+ mappings across 724 frameworks.

Governance and Oversight(8 mappings)

ADMF-1.1Establish data management governance functions2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01Organizational leadership is responsible for cybersecurity risk management
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles and responsibilities for cybersecurity risk management are established
ADMF-1.2Data management function responsibilities
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles and responsibilities for cybersecurity risk management are established
ADMF-1.3Business process function responsibilities
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles and responsibilities for cybersecurity risk management are established
ADMF-1.4Risk management function responsibilities2 targets
→GV.OV-03Risk management performance is evaluated
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon
ADMF-1.5Executive direction and risk appetite2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-02Risk appetite and risk tolerance statements are established
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established

Policies and Procedures(7 mappings)

ADMF-2.1Leadership commitment in policy (who)2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Cybersecurity risk management policy is established based on context and strategy
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01Organizational leadership is responsible for cybersecurity risk management
ADMF-2.2Define objectives, scope and considerations (what and why)2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.OC-01Organizational context for cybersecurity risk management is understood
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon
ADMF-2.3Establish the data management approach (how)
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Cybersecurity risk management policy is established based on context and strategy
ADMF-2.4Embed data management in corporate governance and policy2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Cybersecurity risk management policy is established based on context and strategy
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02Policy is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced

Data Inventory(4 mappings)

ADMF-3.1Identify and understand organisational data
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-07Inventories of data and corresponding metadata are maintained
ADMF-3.2Maintain a data inventory2 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-07Inventories of data and corresponding metadata are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-08Systems, hardware, software, and services are managed throughout their life cycles
ADMF-3.3Apply overarching categorisation considerations
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-05Assets are prioritized based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact

Impact / Risk Assessment(1 mappings)

ADMF-4.1Establish a data categorisation matrix
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-05Assets are prioritized based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact

+22 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 724 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASEAN Data Management Framework comparisons

ASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 523 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 724 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 724 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (440K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASEAN Data Management Framework and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

ASEAN Data Management Framework has 27 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 26 overlapping controls (96% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Controls, where 1 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASEAN Data Management Framework and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 27 total ASEAN Data Management Framework controls, 26 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 96% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASEAN Data Management Framework to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

1 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Controls with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASEAN Data Management Framework and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Controls (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.