TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

41
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 43% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(10 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup5 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(5 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

Incident Response and Media Protection(5 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition5 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk

+21 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.018 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 10 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 15 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

20 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.