Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023vsISO 13485:2016
See exactly how Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls map to ISO 13485:2016. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 maps to ISO 13485:2016 with 9% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CIRMP: Governance and Reporting.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
CIRMP: Application and Material Risk(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 comparisons
Other ISO 13485:2016 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 and ISO 13485:2016?
Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 has 11 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485:2016 covers 60 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CIRMP: Governance and Reporting, where 3 Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls have no direct ISO 13485:2016 equivalent.
How many controls map between Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 and ISO 13485:2016?
Of 11 total Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls, 1 map directly to ISO 13485:2016 controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 to ISO 13485:2016?
10 Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485:2016. The highest concentration of gaps is in CIRMP: Governance and Reporting with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 and ISO 13485:2016?
The domain with the highest gap count is CIRMP: Governance and Reporting (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.