NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsISO 27002:2022
See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to ISO 27002:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27002:2022 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to ISO 27002:2022 with 71% coverage across 276 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 320 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 44 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 320 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 666 mapped controls across 24 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AC - Access Control(20 mappings)
+646 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ISO 27002:2022 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27002:2022 controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into ISO 27002:2022 lands at 84.9%, while ISO 27002:2022 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 36.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 evidence buys you for ISO 27002:2022, the other asks the reverse.
79 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 14 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Organization-wide security program plan approved, disseminated and reviewed evidences the policy set.
Grounded in NIST800-PM-1 Information Security Program Plan. Develop and disseminate an organization-wide information security program plan that: Provides an overview of the requirements for the security program and a description of the security program management controls and. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Requires a matching set of information labelling procedures to be developed and implemented, so that information carries markings consistent with the classification scheme the organisation has adopted.
Every one of the 79 evidenced controls and 14 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
110 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 190 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Rules to control access must be established, documented and implemented as policy.
Grounded in iso-27002-2022::5.15 Access control. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Concurrent Session Control. Limit the number of concurrent sessions for each [organization-defined] to [organization-defined]
Every one of the 110 evidenced controls and 190 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 71% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27002:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons
Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ISO 27002:2022?
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 320 controls across its framework, while ISO 27002:2022 covers 104 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 276 overlapping controls (71% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 14 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct ISO 27002:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ISO 27002:2022?
Of 320 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 276 map directly to ISO 27002:2022 controls, representing 71% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ISO 27002:2022?
44 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27002:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ISO 27002:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.