Cross-Framework Mapping

PCI DSS 4.0vsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

See exactly how PCI DSS 4.0 controls map to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

409
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
96%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PCI DSS 4.0 maps to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 with 96% coverage across 240 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 249 PCI DSS 4.0 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 249 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 409 mapped controls across 12 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Req 1: Network Security Controls(20 mappings)

1.1.1NSC policies and procedures documented
CCM-IVS-01Infrastructure and Virtualization Security Policy and Procedures
1.1.2Roles and responsibilities for Requirement 12 targets
CCM-GRC-06Governance Responsibility Model
CCM-HRS-09Personnel Roles and Responsibilities
1.2.1NSC configuration standards defined2 targets
CCM-IVS-03Network Security
CCM-IVS-04OS Hardening and Base Controls
1.2.2Changes to NSC reviewed and approved2 targets
CCM-CCC-01Change Management Policy and Procedures
CCM-CCC-03Change Management Technology
1.2.3Network diagrams maintained
CCM-IVS-08Network Architecture Documentation
1.2.4Data flow diagram of account data2 targets
CCM-DSP-03Data Inventory
CCM-DSP-05Data Flow Documentation
1.2.5Services, protocols, ports inventoried and justified2 targets
CCM-DCS-06Assets Cataloguing and Tracking
CCM-IVS-04OS Hardening and Base Controls
1.2.6Security features for insecure services defined
CCM-IVS-04OS Hardening and Base Controls
1.2.7NSC rule sets reviewed every six months
CCM-IVS-03Network Security
1.2.8Configuration files secured and synchronised2 targets
CCM-CCC-04Unauthorized Change Protection
CCM-CCC-07Detection of Baseline Deviation
1.3.1Inbound traffic to CDE restricted2 targets
CCM-IVS-03Network Security
CCM-IVS-06Segmentation and Segregation
1.3.2Outbound traffic from CDE restricted
CCM-IVS-03Network Security
1.3.3NSCs between wireless and CDE
CCM-IVS-06Segmentation and Segregation

+389 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The PCI DSS 4.0 to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls your existing PCI DSS 4.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. PCI DSS 4.0 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 60.4%, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into PCI DSS 4.0 lands at 41%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your PCI DSS 4.0 evidence buys you for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1, the other asks the reverse.

PCI DSS 4.0 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
60.4%

119 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for PCI DSS 4.0. 78 are genuine gaps.

87.5%IAM - Identity & Access Management
84.6%LOG - Logging & Monitoring
47.6%CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management
52.6%DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 228 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Requires periodic reviews confirming personnel follow security policies and procedures.

Grounded in 12.4.2 Quarterly PCI compliance reviews (SP). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-03 Risk Based Planning Assessment

Drive the scope and frequency of independent assessments from a documented risk assessment, so higher risk systems and processes are examined more often than lower risk ones.

Every one of the 119 evidenced controls and 78 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into PCI DSS 4.0
41%

102 of 249 PCI DSS 4.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 147 are genuine gaps.

45.9%Req 12: Information Security Policies
63.2%Req 6: Secure Systems and Software
41.4%Req 8: Identify and Authenticate Users
42.3%Req 9: Restrict Physical Access
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 330 candidate mappings were examined and 10 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 1.1.1 NSC policies and procedures documented

Infrastructure and virtualization security policy and procedures are the same artefact.

Grounded in CCM-IVS-01 Infrastructure and Virtualization Security Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 1.1.2 Roles and responsibilities for Requirement 1

Roles and responsibilities for performing activities in Requirement 1 are documented, assigned, and understood.

Every one of the 102 evidenced controls and 147 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

PCI DSS 4.0 to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 96% in the header counts how many PCI DSS 4.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between PCI DSS 4.0 and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

PCI DSS 4.0 has 249 controls across its framework, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 covers 197 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 240 overlapping controls (96% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data, where 4 PCI DSS 4.0 controls have no direct Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 equivalent.

How many controls map between PCI DSS 4.0 and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

Of 249 total PCI DSS 4.0 controls, 240 map directly to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, representing 96% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI DSS 4.0 to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

9 PCI DSS 4.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. The highest concentration of gaps is in Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI DSS 4.0 and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

The domain with the highest gap count is Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.