TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 36% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Supply Chain and Dependencies(2 mappings)

A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security

Asset, Change, and Configuration Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration Management
→NSS17-4.4Configuration Management

Identity and Access Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control
→NSS17-4.1Access Control

Event and Incident Response(3 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response
AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting
→NSS17-5.2Incident Response

Situational Awareness and Event Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-SA-2Anomaly Detection
→NSS17-5.1Continuous Monitoring

Threat and Vulnerability Management(3 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→NSS17-6.3Information Sharing

Risk Management(7 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)22 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 12 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 14 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

25 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.