TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security with 56% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Supply Chain and Dependencies(3 mappings)

A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures
→NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management2 targets
→NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment
→NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework

Asset, Change, and Configuration Management(4 mappings)

AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration Management2 targets
→NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management
→NIST82-RM-05OT Security Training and Awareness
AESCSF-ACM-3Change Management2 targets
→NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring
→NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management

Identity and Access Management(3 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control
→NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control
AESCSF-IAM-3Multi-Factor Authentication2 targets
→NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management
→NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment

Event and Incident Response(9 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan3 targets
→NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning
→NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
→NIST82-IR-05OT Forensics
AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability3 targets
→NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning
→NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
→NIST82-IR-05OT Forensics
AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting3 targets
→NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning
→NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
→NIST82-IR-05OT Forensics

Risk Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process
→NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity22 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsIEC 62443 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsDO-326A / ED-202A vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 9 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 22 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

17 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.