TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience StandardvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 14% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Check.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(5 mappings)

4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
4.3.2Legal and Other Requirements3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

Implementation and Operation(8 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority5 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
4.4.2Competence, Training, and Awareness3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

Incident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response(6 mappings)

4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response3 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
4.4.8Business Continuity and Recovery3 targets
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems12 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 13485:201612 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO/IEC 42001:20239 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 22301:20199 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 14001:20159 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 45001:20188 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 27701:20198 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 14004:20168 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard has 42 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Check, where 6 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 42 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 6 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

36 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Check with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Check (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.