Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience StandardvsISO/IEC 42001:2023

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard maps to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 with 21% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Check.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(1 mappings)

4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
iso-iec-42001-2023::6.1.2Risk assessment

Implementation and Operation(1 mappings)

4.4.3Communication and Warning
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.4Communication

Checking and Corrective Action(1 mappings)

4.5.5Internal Audit
iso-iec-42001-2023::9.2Internal audit

Planning(1 mappings)

SPC1-4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
iso-iec-42001-2023::6.1.2Risk assessment

Support(1 mappings)

SPC1-4.4.3Communication and Warning
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.4Communication

Check(2 mappings)

SPC1-4.5.4Nonconformity, Corrective and Preventive Action
iso-iec-42001-2023::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
SPC1-4.5.6Internal Audit
iso-iec-42001-2023::9.2Internal audit

Act(2 mappings)

SPC1-4.6Management Review
iso-iec-42001-2023::9.3Management review
SPC1-A.1Continual Improvement
iso-iec-42001-2023::10.1Continual improvement

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard has 42 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 covers 80 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Check, where 4 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct ISO/IEC 42001:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

Of 42 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 9 map directly to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard to ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

33 ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 42001:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Check with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard and ISO/IEC 42001:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Check (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.