TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 28% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cyber Security Strategy and Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Asset Management(2 mappings)

ASIC-CR-AM-1Centralised asset management system
→NIST800-CM-8System component inventory
ASIC-CR-AM-2Configuration management
→NIST800-CM-6Configuration settings

Cyber Awareness and Training(2 mappings)

ASIC-CR-AT-1Staff awareness and training
→NIST800-AT-2Literacy training and awareness
ASIC-CR-AT-2Continuous development
→NIST800-AT-3Role-based training

Detection Systems and Processes(2 mappings)

ASIC-CR-DE-1Continuous monitoring with SIEM
→NIST800-AU-6Audit record review, analysis, and reporting
ASIC-CR-DE-3Red teaming
→NIST800-CA-8Penetration testing

Protective Measures and Controls(2 mappings)

ASIC-CR-PR-3Encryption of data at rest and in transit2 targets
→NIST800-SC-28Protection of information at rest
→NIST800-SC-8Transmission confidentiality and integrity

Cyber Risk Management and Threat Assessment(1 mappings)

ASIC-CR-RM-1Intelligence-led cyber risk management
→NIST800-RA-3Risk assessment

Related Comparisons

Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.027 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs APRA CPS 23411 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents7 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs ACSC Essential Eight1 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5130 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 540 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 535 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 534 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 716 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 29 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 192 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cyber Security Strategy and Governance, where 6 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 29 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

21 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cyber Security Strategy and Governance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cyber Security Strategy and Governance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.