ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsAPRA CPS 234
See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to APRA CPS 234. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to APRA CPS 234 with 38% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protective Measures and Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.
Asset Management(3 mappings)
Cyber Awareness and Training(1 mappings)
Cyber Security Strategy and Governance(5 mappings)
Protective Measures and Controls(1 mappings)
Cyber Risk Management and Threat Assessment(2 mappings)
Response and Recovery Planning(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons
Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 719 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234?
ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 29 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 234 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protective Measures and Controls, where 4 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct APRA CPS 234 equivalent.
How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234?
Of 29 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 11 map directly to APRA CPS 234 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to APRA CPS 234?
18 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 234. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protective Measures and Controls with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and APRA CPS 234?
The domain with the highest gap count is Protective Measures and Controls (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.