TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsIAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
57
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 10% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 69 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 72 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 69 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(5 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→NSS17-4.4Configuration Management
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

Operation(1 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(4 mappings)

ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS3 targets
→NSS17-3.1Computer Security Zones
→NSS17-4.1Access Control
→NSS17-4.3Supply Chain Security

Planning (Clause 6)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities2 targets
→NSS17-2.1Threat Assessment
→NSS17-2.2Vulnerability Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence16 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products16 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food15 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs CIS Controls v814 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements14 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence13 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 2700512 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)11 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)10 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System has 69 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 11 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 69 total AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 8 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 72 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System to IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

72 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and IAEA Nuclear Security Series — Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.